# Our articles > Reference HTML page: https://leaid.ai/en/articles > Language: en > Articles Generative AI, legaltech, regulated professions and growth strategies — read from the field. - [For the AI giants, law is not a market: it is an enterprise vertical](https://leaid.ai/en/articles/geants-ia-marche-droit-verticale/index.md) (2026-07-15) — In under six months, Anthropic, Microsoft, Perplexity, OpenAI and Google have all staked out positions in the legal market. Our reading: for these players, legal is not a destination but one of the verticals of a broader ambition — to become the software infrastructure of the enterprise. Legaltechs are entering an ambivalent relationship with suppliers on which they depend and which are courting their own clients; French and European champions are already in the crosshairs. For legal professionals, the conclusion is operational: multi-solution architecture and interoperability must become market standards. - [Regulated professions do not need spectacular AI. They need responsible AI.](https://leaid.ai/en/articles/ia-responsable-professions-reglementees/index.md) (2026-07-01) — Regulated professions are not hostile to innovation. They are simply bound by particular obligations: independence, professional secrecy, competence, responsibility, traceability and the protection of individuals. AI should therefore not be conceived as a break with these principles, but as an infrastructure compatible with them. - [Generative AI will not win regulated sectors through disruption, but through trust](https://leaid.ai/en/articles/ia-generative-secteurs-regules-confiance/index.md) (2026-06-15) — The dominant narrative continues to present generative AI as a disruptive technology. Yet the markets where it will create the most value will not necessarily be those most open to wholesale disruption. They will be the sectors where information is complex, responsibilities high, processes cumbersome and trust decisive: law, healthcare, finance, insurance, energy, defence, the public sector and regulated professions. - [The battle for legal AI will not be decided by the best model, but by control of the workflow](https://leaid.ai/en/articles/ia-juridique-maitrise-du-workflow/index.md) (2026-06-01) — The legal AI market is entering a new phase. After a proliferation of demonstrations and general-purpose assistants, value is shifting towards integrated uses: case files, contracts, research, client relations, compliance, billing, knowledge management and collaboration. In this battle, the winner will not necessarily be the player with the best language model. It will be the one that manages to occupy the daily workflow of legal professionals. - [Claude in law firms: the tool is brilliant, but is the provider ready for regulated professions?](https://leaid.ai/en/articles/claude-avocats-professions-reglementees/index.md) (2026-05-01) — The enthusiasm around Claude is understandable. Its ability to read long documents, compare versions, structure an analysis and produce first drafts makes it one of the most appealing tools for the legal professions. But for French lawyers, the question is not whether Claude performs well. It is whether its contractual, operational, economic and professional ethics environment is robust enough to accommodate the data, uses and responsibilities of a regulated profession. ## In the press Third-party mentions (media, institutions, events) are available on the HTML page: https://leaid.ai/en/articles#presse --- Markdown version of https://leaid.ai/en/articles — Leaid · https://leaid.ai · https://leaid.ai/llms.txt